Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil

Transcrição

1 Herpetology Notes, volume 7: (2014) (published online on 18 June 2014) Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil Maria Juliana Borges-Leite¹,2 *, João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues 2,3 and Diva Maria Borges-Nojosa¹,2 Abstract. We surveyed amphibians and reptiles in São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, Northeastern Brazil, from December 2007 to May We recorded 23 species of amphibians from six families and 37 species of reptiles from 1 families (one amphisbaenid, one freshwater turtle, 14 lizards and 21 snakes). The distributions of Scinax nebulosus and S. fuscomarginatus were expanded to the coastal region of Ceará. Species accumulation curves for reptiles and amphibians reached an asymptote. Richness estimators predicted 2 species of amphibians and 42 of reptiles. The herpetofauna of the study area is very similar to that of Caatinga areas of Ceará and is less similar to that of nearby areas of Atlantic rainforest. Keywords: Amphibians, Squamata, Reptiles, Ceará, Semi-deciduous forest, Similarity. Introduction Previous studies on amphibians and reptiles in Ceará, northeastern Brazil, have focused on the Caatinga and relictual tropical rainforests ( Brejos de Altitude ) (e.g., Borges-Nojosa et al., 2010; Loebmann and Haddad, 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2012). The lack of studies on the coastal zone is illustrated by the fact that some large reptiles with apparently stable populations (Eunectes murinus and Paleosuchus palpebrosus; Mendonça et al., 2009; Lima et al., 2011), which are well known to the locals, have been only officially reported recently. The state of Ceará has about four phytophysiognomies: Atlantic rainforest, Caatinga, Cerrado and Coastal ¹ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará UFC, Campus do Pici, CEP , Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. 2 Núcleo Regional de Ofiologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará NUROF UFC, Campus do Pici, Bloco 90, CEP: , Fortaleza CE, Brazil 3 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Departamento de Ecologia, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Goiás UFG, Campus Samambaia, CEP , Goiânia, GO, Brazil. * Corresponding author, M.J. Borges-Leite, jborgesleite@gmail.com vegetation complex (Figueiredo, 1997). Although studies involving herpetofauna of Ceará started around the nineteenth century (Lopes and Silva, 2003), not all of these physiognomies were fully prospected. Specifically, the coastal region has been poorly investigated, with only a general study, which only reports some species of the Coastal region, without providing a list (Cascon and Borges-Nojosa, 2003). The Northeast Coast of Ceará has a warm and dry climate. Its closeness to both the Cerrado and Caatinga allows the occurrence of species from these two domains, forming a vegetation complex (Castro et al., 2012). Both are savanna formations with shrubs and two well-defined seasons (dry and rainy; Coutinho, 2006). Additionally, rain forest areas nearby could also influence this vegetation complex. The coastal area of the city of São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, has been subject to land speculation and is being developed into a Port and Industrial Complex. This enterprise is contributing to rapid changes in local conditions and may cause a strong impact on local wildlife. Given the lack of research in the area, it is difficult to propose a management plan for the conservation of local fauna. As a result, an available list of the herpetofauna of this coastal area in Ceará is lacking. Here, we surveyed amphibians and reptiles of the coastal region of São Gonçalo do Amarante, reported geographic distribution extension for some species found in the area and tested their similarity with other

2 406 Maria Juliana Borges-Leite et al. Figure 1. Map of study site in São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, Brazil. Sampling sites: (black diamond) Taíba; (black square) Jardim Botânico; and (black circle) Dunas. physiognomies of Ceará. We compare the study area with surveys in Ceará in order to make a general characterisation of the diversity of this coastal region in comparison to nearby areas. Material and Methods Study area São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, Brazil has an area of km², and the predominant vegetation is semideciduous coastal forest (Figueiredo, 1997). The study area includes floristic elements of Caatinga, Cerrado, and Restinga, corroborating the idea that the plant community of the coastal region of Ceará has an ecotonal nature (Castro et al., 2012). The mean annual maximum temperature is 28 C and minimum is 26 C, and the mean annual rainfall is 1,026 mm, mainly concentrated from January to June (FUNCEME, 2014). Sampling occurred in three sites (Figure 1 and 2) chosen randomly with similar vegetation and climate: Dunas (-3.427, ; 7 m a.s.l. hereafter datum WGS84), Jardim Botânico ( , ; 28 m a.s.l.), and Taíba (-3.120, ; 13 m a.s.l.). Data collection We conducted fieldwork during 18 months, four days per month, from December 2007 to May In December 2007 and in April 2008, the effort was greater with two sampling periods of four days in each of these months. Specimens were collected using five stations of pitfall traps with drift fences in each sampling site (Cechin and Martins, 2000; Heyer et al., 2001), consisting of four 60-L plastic buckets, disposed in a Y arrangement in each station. This methodology was applied in each sampling site, totaling 1 traps/day. We also used timeconstrained searches (transects; Heyer et al., 2001) lasting one hour in an area of 600 m² during the daytime, totaling 108 person/hours of sampling effort. We used unlimited active search at night near lakes (Heyer et al., 2001). Voucher specimens were euthanised by injection of lidocaine hydrochlorid, fixed in 10% formalin and preserved in 70% ethanol (Auricchio and Salomão, 2002). Specimens were deposited in the Coleção de Herpetologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará

3 Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil 407 Figure 2. Study areas A- Taíba; B- Dunas; and C- Jardim Botânico. (CHUFC; Appendix 1). Nomenclature followed Frost (2014) for amphibians and Uetz (2014) for reptiles. Data analysis We built species accumulation curves separately for amphibians and reptiles to analyse monthly sampling effort (Gotelli and Colwell, 2001). These curves were based in the Mao Tau s method for species accumulation in the software EstimateS (version 8.0.0) (Colwell, 2006), with a confidence interval of 9%. The richness of amphibians and reptiles was estimated with the firstorder Jackknife. We compared the herpetofauna of São Gonçalo do Amarante with data from other physiognomies (Caatinga, Cerrado and Brejos-de-altitude) from the state of Ceará with Jaccard s Similarity Index and represented using the UPGMA clustering method. The herpetofauna of Caatinga areas were obtained from Borges-Nojosa and Cascon (200), Borges-Nojosa et al. (2010), Loebmann and Haddad (2010) and Ribeiro et al. (2012); Brejos-de-altitude from Borges-Nojosa (2007), Loebmann and Haddad (2010) and Ribeiro et al. (2012); and Cerrado from Loebmann and Haddad (2010) and Ribeiro et al. (2012). The herpetofauna of Serra da Ibiapaba (Loebmann and Haddad, 2010) and Chapada do Araripe (Ribeiro et al., 2012) were divided in those three physiognomies according to information presented in these papers. We did not include unidentified or introduced species. These analyses were made using the free software Past v (Hammer et al., 2001). Results We recorded 23 species of anurans from six families (Table 1), 36 species of squamate from 14 families and one species of chelonian (Table 2). Accumulation curves based on monthly sampling effort (Figure 3 and

4 408 Maria Juliana Borges-Leite et al. Table 1. List of amphibians recorded in São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, Brazil. Locality of occurrence: D- Dunas; J- Jardim Botânico and T- Taíba. Capturing method: Las- Limited active search; Nlas- Non-limited active search and Pt- Pitfall traps. Habitat registered in the literature: Ca- Caatinga; Ce- Cerrado and Rf- Rainforest. Record of the occurrence of the species in Ceará (ROSC): 1- Borges-Nojosa and Cascon (200); 2-Borges-Nojosa (2007); 3- Borges-Nojosa et al. (2010); 4- Loebmann and Haddad (2010); - Ribeiro et al. (2012). Asterisk (*) indicates which species have not been used for the similarity analysis. Family Species Locality Method Habitat ROSC Bufonidae Rhinella granulosa (Spix, 1824) D Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Rhinella jimi (Stevaux, 2002) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Odontophrynidae Proceratophrys cristiceps (Müller, ) T Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Dendropsophus microcephalus (Cope, 1886) D, T Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 3, 4 Hylidae Leptodactylidae Microhylidae Total six families, 23 species Dendropsophus nanus (Boulenger, 1889) D Nlas Ca, Rf 3, 4, Hypsiboas raniceps Cope, 1862 D, J, T Nlas Ca, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Phyllomedusa nordestina Caramaschi, 2006 J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Scinax fuscomarginatus (Lutz, 192) D Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 4, Scinax nebulosus (Spix, 1824) T Nlas Ca, Rf 4 Scinax x-signatus (Spix, 1824) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, *Leptodactylus aff. hylaedactylus D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca - Leptodactylus fuscus (Schneider, 1799) D, J, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Rf 1, 3, 4, Leptodactylus macrosternum Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 D, J, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Leptodactylus mystaceus (Spix, 1824) D, J, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Leptodactylus pustulatus (Peters, 1870) D, J, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Rf 2, 3 Leptodactylus troglodytes Lutz, 1926 D, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Leptodactylus vastus Lutz, 1930 T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Physalaemus albifrons (Spix, 1824) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca 3, 4, Physalaemus cuvieri Fitzinger, 1826 D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Pleurodema diplolister (Peters, 1870) T Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce 1, 3, 4, Pseudopaludicola mystacalis J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Rf 2, 4, Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 188) J, T Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Elachistocleis piauiensis Caramschi & Jim, 1983 D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca 3, 4, 4) showed that the richness of amphibians and reptiles reached an asymptote. The richness estimator predicted 2 species of amphibians (Jackknife = 2.8 ± 2.08) and 42 of reptiles (Jackknife = 42.7 ± 2.79), considering chelonians and squamates as one group. The herpetofauna of the study area is very similar to that of Caatinga areas of Ceará (Figure and 6) and most likely represents a mixture of species from these three physiognomies, Caatinga, Cerrado and rainforest. The study area is more similar to distant Caatinga areas, such as Serra da Ibiapaba and Chapada do Araripe than to nearby areas of rainforest such as Serra de Baturité. It is also different from the Cerrado areas of Serra da Ibiapaba and Chapada do Araripe. Discussion The study area has species broadly distributed over Ceará such as Tropidurus hispidus, Ameiva ameiva, Rhinella jimi, which were found in all physiognomies. Ameivula ocellifera, Salvator merianae, Iguana iguana, Rhinella granulosa, Leptodactylus vastus, Leptodactylus macrosternum and Proceratophrys cristiceps were also present in almost all physiognomies in Ceará. Anurans recorded in the studied area, in general, were generalist species regarding habitat use, and most of the species were typical of Caatinga areas (Arzabe, 1999; Borges-Nojosa et al., 2010; Loebmann and Haddad, 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2012). The reptiles, in general, also were habitat generalists, and were also representatives of the Caatinga herpetofauna (Rodrigues, 2003; Borges- Nojosa et al., 2010).

5 Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil 409 Table 2. List of reptiles recorded for São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará. Locality of occurrence: D- Dunas; J- Jardim Botânico and T- Taíba. Capturing method: Las- Limited active search; Nlas- Non-limited active search and Pt- Pitfall traps. Habitat registered on the literature: Ca- Caatinga; Ce- Cerrado and Rf- Rainforest. Record of the occurrence of the species in Ceará (ROSC): 1- Borges-Nojosa and Cascon (200); 2-Borges-Nojosa (2007); 3- Borges-Nojosa et al. (2010); 4- Loebmann and Haddad (2010); - Ribeiro et al. (2012). Asterisk (*) indicates which species have not been used for the similarity analysis. Taxa Species Locality Method Habitat ROSC Amphisbaenia Amphisbaenidae Amphisbaena vermicularis Wagler, 1824 D Pt Ca, Rf 3, 4, Sauria Iguanidae Iguana iguana (Linnaeus, 178) T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Hemidactylus agrius Vanzolini, 1978 J, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 3, 4, Gekkonidae Hemidactylus mabouia (Moreau de Jonnès, 1818) T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 4, Lygodactylus klugei (Smith,Martin & Swain,1977) D Nlas, Pt Ca 1, 3, Colobosauroides cearensis Cunha, Lima-Verde & Lima, 1991 D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Rf 2, 4 Gymnophthalmidae Micrablepharus maximiliani (Reinhardt & Lütken, 1862) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Vanzosaura rubricauda (Boulenger, 1902) D, T Nlas, Pt Ca 1, 3, 4, Scincidae Brasiliscincus heathi (Schmidt & Inger, 191) J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Polychrotidae Polychrus acutirostris Spix, 182 J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Sphaerodactylidae Coleodactylus meridionalis (Boulenger, 1888) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Ameiva ameiva (Linnaeus, 178) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Teiidae Ameivula ocellifera (Spix, 182) J, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 3, 4, Salvator merianae (Duméril & Bibron, 1839) J, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Tropiduridae Tropidurus hispidus (Spix, 182) D, J, T Las, Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Serpentes Boidae Boa constrictor Linnaeus, 178 D, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Epicrates cenchria (Linnaeus, 178) J Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 3 Drymarchon corais (Boie, 1827) J Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 4 Leptophis ahaetulla (Linnaeus, 178) J, T Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 3, 4, Colubridae Mastigodryas bifossatus Raddi, 1820 J Nlas - - Oxybelis aeneus (Wagler, 1824) J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus, 178) J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Tantilla melanocephala (Linnaeus, 178) D, T Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 4, Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 182) J, T Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 4, Erythrolamprus taeniogaster Jan, 1863 D Nlas Ca, Rf 4, Helicops leopardinus (Schlegel, 1837) J, T Nlas Ca Lygophis dilepis (Cope, 1862) D, T Nlas Ca 4, Oxyrhopus trigeminus Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 184 J, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 3, 4, Dipsadidae Philodryas nattereri Steindachner, 1870 J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 3, 4, Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823) J, T Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 3, 4, Pseudoboa nigra (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 184) T Nlas Ca, Rf 3, 4, Psomophis joberti (Sauvage, 1884) J, T Las, Nlas Ca 4, Taeniophallus occipitalis (Jan, 1863) J Nlas, Pt Ca, Ce, Rf 2, 4, Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) J Nlas Ca, Rf 2, 3, 4, Elapidae Micrurus ibiboboca (Merrem, 1820) J Nlas Ca, Ce, Rf 1, 2, 4, Typhlopidae *Typhlops aff. amoipira D, J Pt - - Testudines Chelidae Mesoclemmys tuberculata (Lüderwaldt, 1926) T Nlas Ca, Rf 3, 4, Total 1 families, 37 species

6 410 Maria Juliana Borges-Leite et al. Figure 3. Accumulation curve of amphibians produced using the number of species found and number of samples (field periods): Species observed (SOBS) 9% upper and lower bound is confidence interval; Sobs Mao Tau is richness observed. Figure 4. Accumulation curve of reptiles produced using the number of species found and number of samples (field periods): Species observed (SOBS) 9% upper and lower bound is confidence interval; Sobs Mao Tau is richness observed. The distribution of Scinax nebulosus and S. fuscomarginatus were extended to the coastal region of Ceará. Despite being described as widely distributed (Peters and Orejas-Miranda, 1970), Mastigodryas bifossatus was recorded for Ceará in only two studies (Lima-Verde and Cascon, 1990; Mesquita et al., 2013). According to national (MMA, 2014) and international (IUCN, 2014) lists of endangered species, no endangered species were found in this study. Previously, the coastal region of Ceará was classified as physiognomically distinct from Caatinga (Fernandes, 1990; Figueiredo, 1997), but recently it has been suggested that its flora has ecotonal characteristics that include species from Cerrado and Caatinga (Castro et al., 2012). Our comparisons of similarity index and cluster analyses indicate a similarity between the study area and Caatinga and reinforce the ecotonal view of the Vegetational Complex of Ceará which has amphibians and reptiles found in Caatinga, Cerrado and Rainforest areas (see Table 1 and 2, and Figures and 6). The higher similarity between the herpetofauna of the study area and distant Caatinga regions than to nearby areas of Brejos de Altitude suggest that physiognomies have higher influence in similarities between herpetofauna of different areas than geographic distance. To conclude, the herpetofauna of the study area is similar to Caatinga areas, but it also shares species with Rainforest and Cerrado areas. Moreover, this coastal herpetofauna presents evidence of having ecotonal characteristics. Environmental impacts observed in this Figure. Dendrogram for cluster analysis (UPGMA) using the Jaccard s Similarity Index between the amphibians of the coastal region of São Gonçalo do Amarante (SGA) and the other areas studied in Ceará State. Cophenetic correlation coefficient = Source: 1- Borges-Nojosa & Cascon (200) SDA (Serra das Almas Caatinga); 2-Borges-Nojosa (2007) BAT (Baturité Rainforest); 3- Borges-Nojosa et al. (2010) CAU (Caucaia Caatinga); PAC (Pacajús Caatinga) ; 4- Loebmann & Haddad (2010) IBCA (Ibiapaba Caatinga); IBCE (Ibiapaba Cerrado); IBMU (Ibiapaba Rainforest); - Ribeiro et al. (2012) ARCA (Araripe Caatinga); ARCE (Araripe Cerrado); ARMU (Araripe Rainforest).

7 Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil 411 their company and assistance in the field; Daniel Cassiano and James Harris for reviewing the manuscript and making useful suggestions. We are grateful to the Delphi Projetos e Gestão Ltda and Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) for financial support. References Figure 6. Dendrogram of the cluster analysis (UPGMA) using the Jaccard s Similarity Index between the reptiles of the coastal region of São Gonçalo do Amarante (SGA) and the other areas studied in Ceará State. Cophenetic correlation coefficient = Source: 1- Borges-Nojosa & Cascon (200) SDA (Serra das Almas Caatinga); 2-Borges-Nojosa (2007) BAT (Baturité Rainforest); 3- Borges-Nojosa et al. (2010) CAU (Caucaia Caatinga); PAC (Pacajús Caatinga) ; 4- Loebmann & Haddad (2010) IBCA (Ibiapaba Caatinga); IBCE (Ibiapaba Cerrado); IBMU (Ibiapaba Rainforest); - Ribeiro et al. (2012) ARCA (Araripe Caatinga); ARCE (Araripe Cerrado); ARMU (Araripe Rainforest). area due to the installation of the Port and Industrial Complex underscore the need to implement conservation measures to ensure biodiversity protection. Even if we have not listed threatened species in this municipality, we extended the distribution of two species of anurans and found at least two taxa not yet defined. New studies are required to improve the characterisation of the biodiversity in the region and thus be able to develop a management plan and take appropriate conservation measures. Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA) for granting collecting permits (authorization #04/07-NUFAU- CE and # ). We thank the direction of the Jardim Botânico de São Gonçalo do Amarante for the access of space; Mr. and Mrs. Borges for the stay and for allowing the use of their property for research; Daniel Passos, Otávio Bezerra and Flávia Prado for Arzabe, C. (1999): Reproductive activity patterns of anurans in two different altitudinal sites within the Brazilian Caatinga. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 16(3): Auricchio, P., Salomão, M.G. (2002): Técnicas de Coleta e Preparação Vertebrados. Arujá: Instituto Pau Brasil de História Natural, São Paulo. Borges-Nojosa, D.M., Cascon, P. (200): Herpetofauna da Área Reserva da Serra das Almas, Ceará. In: Análise das Variações da Biodiversidade do Bioma Caatinga, pp Araújo, F.S., Rodal, M.J.N., Barbosa, M.R.V (orgs.), Volume 1. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Borges-Nojosa, D.M. (2007): Diversidade de Anfíbios e Répteis da Serra de Baturité, Ceará. In: Diversidade e Conservação da Biota na Serra de Baturité, Ceará, pp Oliveira, T.S., Araújo, F.S. (orgs.), 1ª Ed. Fortaleza: Edições UFC. Borges-Nojosa, D.M., Prado, F.M.V., Borges-Leite, M.J., Gurgel Filho, N.M., Bacalini, P. (2010): Avaliação do Impacto do Manejo Florestal Sustentável na Herpetofauna de Duas Áreas de Caatinga nos Municípios de Caucaia e Pacajus, no Estado do Ceará. In: Uso Sustentável e Conservação dos Recursos Florestais da Caatinga, pp Gariglio, M.A., Sampaio, E.V.S.B., Cestaro, L.A., Kageyama, P.Y. (orgs.), Volume 1. Brasília: Serviço Florestal Brasileiro. Castro, A.S.F., Moro, M.F., Menezes, M.O.T. (2012): O Complexo Vegetacional da Zona Litorânea no Ceará: Pecém, São Gonçalo do Amarante. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26(1): Cascon, P., Borges-Nojosa, D.M. (2003): Anfíbios. In: A Zona Costeira do Ceará: Diagnóstico para a Gestão Integrada, pp. 12Campos,. A.A., Monteiro, A.Q., Monteiro-Neto, C., Pollete, M. (eds.). Volume 1. Fortaleza: Gráfica e Editora Pouchain Ramos. Cechin, S.Z., Martins, M. (2000): Eficiência de armadilhas de queda (pitfall traps) em amostragens de anfíbios e répteis no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17(3): Colwell, R.K. (2006): EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates, version Coutinho, L.M. (2006): O conceito de bioma. Acta Botânica Brasílica 20(1): Fernandes, A. (1990): Conjunto vegetacional cearense. In: Temas fitogeográficos, pp Fernandes, A. (org.). Fortaleza, Stylus Comunicações. Figueiredo, M.A. (1997): Unidades Fitoecológicas. In: Atlas do Ceará, pp IPLANCE (org.), Volume 1. Fortaleza: Fundação Instituto de Planejamento do Ceará/ Governo do Estado do Ceará/ SEPLAN. Frost, D.R. (2014): Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Available at: herpetology/amphibia/. Last accessed on 10 May 2014.

8 412 FUNCEME - Fundação Cearense de Meteorologia e Recursos Hídricos (2014): Fundação Cearense de Meteorologia e Recursos Hídricos. Available at: Last accessed on 08 May Gotelli, N.J., Colwell, R.K. (2001): Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters. Montpellier 4(1): Hammer, O., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D. (2001): PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4(1): 9pp. Heyer, R.W., Donnelly, M.A., Hayek, L.C., Foster, M.S. (2001): Medición y Monitoreo de la Diversidad Biológica: Métodos estandarizados para Anfíbios. Volume 1. Editorial Universitária de la Patagônia. IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature (2014): IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: iucn.org/. Last accessed on 08 May Lima, D.C., Lima, F.H.C., Borges-Nojosa, D. M. (2011). Paleosuchus palpebrosus (Cuvier s Dwarf Caiman) - New state record - Geographic distribution. Herpetological Review 42: Lima-Verde, J.S., Cascon, P. (1990): Lista preliminar da herpetofauna do estado do Ceará, Brasil. Caatinga 7(único): Loebmann, D., Haddad, C.F.B. (2010): Amphibians and reptiles from a highly diverse area of the Caatinga domain: composition and conservation implications. Biota Neotropica 10(3): Lopes, M.M., Silva, C.P Investigações em História Natural no Ceará: Os Estudos do Naturalista João da Silva Feijó ( ). Revista de Ciências Humanas 9(1): 1-6. Maria Juliana Borges-Leite et al. Mendonça, S.V., Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Cruz, R.L. (2009): Geographic distribution: Eunectes murinus. Herpetological Review 40(2): 238. Mesquita, P.C.M.D, Passos, D.C., Borges-Nojosa, D.M., Cechin, S.Z. (2013): Ecologia e história natural das serpentes de uma área de Caatinga no nordeste brasileiro. Papéis avulsos de zoologia, 8(8), MMA Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2014): Espécies Brasileiras Ameaçadas. Available at: br/biodiversidade/esp%c3%a9cies-amea%c3%a7adas-deextin%c3%a7%c3%a3o/fauna-amea%c3%a7ada. Last accessed on 03 May Peters, J.A., Orejas-Miranda, B. (1970): Catalogue of the neotropical Squamata. Part I. Snakes. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 297, Ribeiro, S.C., Roberto, I.J., Sales, D.L., Ávila, R.W., Almeira, W.O. (2012): Amphibians and reptiles from the Araripe bioregion, northeastern Brazil. Salamandra 48(3), Rodrigues, M.T. (2003): Herpetofauna da Caatinga. In: Biogeografia, Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga, Recife, pp Tabarelli, M., Silva, J.M.C., Leal, I. (orgs.), Editora da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Uetz, P. (2014): The Reptile Database. Available at: reptile-database.org. Last accessed on 10 May 2014.

9 Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil 413 Appendix Voucher specimens deposited in the Coleção de Herpetologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará (CHUFC) collected in São Gonçalo do Amarante, State of Ceará, Brazil. Amphibians: Dendropsophus microcephalus (UFC A4832, UFC A216, UFC A219-20, UFC A487, UFC A218). Dermatonotus muelleri (UFC A4924, UFC A4989, UFC A274, UFC A323). Elachistocleis piauiensis (UFC A4806, UFC A4811, UFC A4813, UFC A4814, UFC A4820, UFC A482, UFC A4826, UFC A4931, UFC A4949). Hypsiboas raniceps (UFC A4869, UFC A08, UFC A09, UFC A228). Leptodactylus aff. hylaedactylus (UFC A4798, UFC A4800, UFC A4819, UFC A , UFC A077-79, UFC A082). Leptodactylus fuscus (UFC A4818, UFC A229, UFC A230). Leptodactylus macrosternum (UFC A479, UFC A484, UFC A4860, UFC A4864, UFC A4879, UFC A231). Leptodactylus mystaceus (UFC A07, UFC A076, UFC A189, UFC A232, UFC A233). Leptodactylus pustulatus (UFC A4821, UFC A4822, UFC A48, UFC A234, UFC A23). Leptodactylus troglodytes (UFC A4804, UFC A4809, UFC A4833, UFC A4861, UFC A486, UFC A4878). Leptodactylus vastus (UFC A236, UFC A277). Phyllomedusa nordestina (UFC A00). Physalaemus cuvieri (UFC A4887, UFC A4888, UFC A4889, UFC A4908, UFC A121). Physalaemus albifrons (UFC A097-98, UFC A112-1). Pleurodema diplolister (UFC A4801, UFC A4808, UFC A4834, UFC A483, UFC A03, UFC A04). Proceratophrys cristiceps (UFC A01). Pseudopaludicola mystacalis (UFC A , UFC A4891, UFC A , UFC A ). Rhinella granulosa (UFC A4878). Rhinella jimi (UFC A060-63, UFC A24). Scinax fuscomarginatus (UFC A246-48). Scinax nebulosus (UFC A073-74). Scinax x-signatus (UFC A4876, UFC A4890, UFC A064-67). Reptiles: Ameiva ameiva (UFC L302, UFC L31-16, UFC L37, UFC L376, UFC L380). Amphisbaena vermicularis (UFC L342, UFC L374-46). Ameivula ocellifera (UFC L312, UFC L320, UFC L32, UFC L38, UFC L368, UFC L3718). Coleodactylus meridionalis (UFC L321, UFC L3, UFC L39, UFC L360, UFC L367, UFC L392). Colobosauroides cearensis (UFC L308-10, UFC L370-09, UFC L3719). Hemidactylus agrius (UFC L3699). Hemidactylus mabouia (UFC L322, UFC L ). Lygodactylus klugei (UFC L393, UFC L3722). Micrablepharus maximiliani (UFC L301, UFC L346-48, UFC L369, UFC L374). Polychrus acutirostris (UFC L3629). Tropidurus hispidus (UFC L306, UFC L319, UFC L343, UFC L344, UFC L382, UFC L3710). Vanzosaura rubricauda (UFC L334, UFC L338, UFC L391). Boa constrictor (UFC3001). Drymarchon corais (UFC3002). Epicrates cenchria (UFC2970). Helicops leopardinus (UFC2939). Leptophis ahaetulla (UFC2998, UFC3026). Erythrolamprus taeniogaster (UFC3032). Lygophis dilepis (UFC3000, UFC2948). Mastigodryas bifossatus (UFC32). Oxyrhopus trigeminus (UFC2971). Philodryas nattereri (UFC2972). Philodryas olfersii (UFC2938, UFC2973). Pseudoboa nigra (UFC2934, UFC2974,UFC297). Taeniophallus occipitalis (UFC292). Tantilla melanocephala (UFC , UFC2937). Typhlops aff. amoipira (UFC293, UFC2936, UFC296). Xenodon merremii (UFC3040). Accepted by Diogo Provete