FAPESP Bioenergy Research Program BIOEN: Science and Technology for Sustainable Bioenergy Production

Transcrição

1 FAPESP Bioenergy Research Program BIOEN: Science and Technology for Sustainable Bioenergy Production Glaucia Mendes Souza Instituto de Química - Universidade de São Paulo Rubens Maciel Faculdade de Engenharia Química UNICAMP Heitor Cantarella Instituto Agronômico de Campinas Marie-Anne Van Sluys Instituto de Biociências Universidade de São Paulo Andre Nassar ICONE

2 Many governments in the industrialized world are spending less in clean energy research now than they were a few years ago (Editorial, Nature June 6th, 2012) What is missing are solutions that are cheap, scalable and politically viable People Planet Profit Call for serious investment in renewable energy research Increased international cooperation Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approach to problems Energy vs. Biodiversity Protection vs. Environmental Resources Brazil as an example of a renewable energy matrix and the bioethanol program

3 The brazilian energy matrix is 47% renewable Bioethanol represents 20% of Brazil s fuel matrix Total brazilian bioethanol production for 2012/13 is projected at 23.9 billion L Total sugarcane production is estimated to be 571,47 million tons Co-generation (burning of the bagasse in boilers) contributes to 4.7% of our electricity 15 million flex-fuel vehicles 9 million ha sugarcane 405 mills UnicaData, 2012

4 Small Bioenergy Footprint Sugarcane for ethanol uses 2% of agricultural area We have 60 million ha that could be used for expansion Total country area (851 Mha, 100%) Rural properties area (355 Mha, 42%) Area used for agriculture (76.7 Mha, 9%) Pasture 200 Mha Soya 22 Mha Area used for sugarcane for ethanol (4 Mha, 0.5%) Source: Horta Nogueira e Seabra (2008) 4

5 gco2eq/mj 80% reduction of GHG emissions using sugarcane ethanol

6 Mandates around the world: demand of 227 billion Liters of EtOH by 2022 Southwest: dry winter Marginal land, pastureland, and poor soils Drought resistance Crop breeding to new environments Revise nutritional needs and managing of fertilizers Recycle nutrients of crop and industry residues Land Use Change Models

7 Sugarcane Agro-industry

8 Research to expand the industrial model

9 Energy Crops and Green Technologies: a new Green Revolution Designing crops for energy production High yield and fast growth crop Able to produce under short growing seasons Tolerant to periodic drought and low temperatures Low nutrient inputs requirements Relatively small energy inputs for growth and harvest Ability to grow in sub-prime agricultural lands New technologies for biomass processing, fuel production, engines Low cost of energy production from biomass Significantly positive energy balance Significant GHG reduction Low polution Development of biorefinery systems Zero-carbon emission biorefinery Complete substitution of petro-chemicals with biobased chemicals Low water footprint, low polution, low emissions Alcohol chemistry, sugar chemistry, oil chemistry to diversify the biomass industry with co-products

10 Sugarcane: the highest tonnage crop Theoretical maximum: 380 tons/ha Current average: 75 tons/ha Glaucia Mendes Souza, USP; Monalisa Carneiro, Hermann Hoffmann, UFSCAR

11 Breeding and Genomics: the challenging sugarcane genome Glaucia Souza, Carlos Hotta, Marie-Anne Van Sluys, USP Genoma da Cana-de-açúcar (cromossomos) S. officinarum S. spontaneum Giant Genome (n Mpb), Polyploid (2n = cromossomos), ~10 Gb Augusto Garcia, USP; Anete Pereira, UNICAMP

12 Biotechnological tools for the improvement of sugarcane:

13 Fuel production and more: a zero-carbon emission biorefinery It is possible to have bagasse surplus to produce electricity and ethanol Integrated bioethanol, biogas and electricity production (double energy output) Zero carbon emission biorefinery system (consorted bioethanolbiodiesel-biokerosene production) Bio-based chemicals using a synthetic biology approach (production of lactic acid isomers from sucrose, $$$, 190,000 added value) Products from ethanol via acetaldehyde and ethylene route (Green Ethane Process to 98.9% purity) Rubens Maciel, UNICAMP Cantarella, H., Buckeridge, M. S., Van Sluys, M. A., Souza, A. P., Garcia, A. A. F., Nishiyama-Jr, M. Y., Maciel-Filho, R., Brito Cruz, C. H. and Souza, G. M. (2012). Sugarcane: the most efficient crop for biofuel production. Handbook of Bioenergy Crop Plants. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Rotan, Florida, USA. Editors: Chittaranjan Kole, Chandrashekhar P. Joshi and David R. Shonnard. ISBN:

14 SUSTAINABILITY AND IMPACTS Ethanol as a global strategic fuel Land use changes GHG emissions Biomass and soil carbon stocks Water use Biodiversity Regional income generation Job creation and migration Integrating tools Horizontal studies to consolidate sugarcane ethanol as the leading technology path to ethanol and derivatives production

15 Monitoring water quality and aquatic communities Satelite monitoring of water quality Capacity to antecipate changes in euthrofization Bernardo Ruddorf, INPE; Luis Schiesari, USP

16 LUC and ILUC: expansion and GHG emissions Soil carbon stocks N 2 O emissions Remote sensing series feeding an Economic Model for Food vs. Fuel vs. Land vs. Biodiversity Emission monitor Bernardo Ruddorf, INPE; Carlos Cerri, USP; Andre Nassar, ICONE

17 International bioenergy market, certification and policy implications Competitive and sustainable production of bioenergy in South America Central America Africa kL/Ha.yr Potential 4,300 GL 2050: Available land for biofuels (Doornbosch and Steenblik, 2007) New-comers insertion does not depend only on the agricultural and economical aptitudes but on their political institutions, and most important on their capacity to implement public policies for the development of biofuels. Internal public policy legitimacy is a condition necessary for competitiveness. Public regulatory systems orient the private certification systems. NGOs can intervene with public regulation to assure broad sustainability criteria for biofuels production. Certification systems that will prevail (e.g. Bonsucro) are those that present lower cost of verification, biomass specific, make use of ongoing public regulation, reduced costs of compliance and verification and are legitimated by social-economic interests (NGOs). Paulo Furquim de Azevedo, Bruno Perosa; FGV

18 BIOEN DIVISIONS BIOMASS Contribute with knowledge and technologies for Sugarcane Improvement Enable a Systems Biology approach for Biofuel Crops PROCESSING AND ETHANOL TECHNOLOGIES Increasing productivity (amount of ethanol by sugarcane ton), energy saving, water saving and minimizing environmental impacts ENGINES Flex-fuel engines with increased performance, durability and decreased consumption, pollutant emissions BIOREFINERIES AND ALCOHOL CHEMISTRY Complete substitution of fossil fuel derived compounds Sugarchemistry for intermediate chemical production and alcoholchemistry as a petrochemistry substitute IMPACTS Studies to consolidate sugarcane ethanol as the leading technology path to ethanol and derivatives production Horizontal themes: Social and Economic Impacts, Environmental studies and Land Use

19 FAPESP Bioenergy Research Program BIOEN Fundamental knowledge and new technologies for a bio-based society Academic Basic and Applied Research (US$ 30 million) Since 2008, 89 grants, 300 brazilian researchers, collaborators from 15 countries Regular, Theme and Young Investigator Awards Open to foreign scientists who want to come to Brazil State of São Paulo Bioenergy Research Center (US$ 90 million) International partnerships United States, United Kingdom and The Netherlands (Oak Ridge National Laboratories, UKRC, BBSRC, BE-Basic) Innovation Technology, Joint industry-university research (5 years) Company Oxiteno Braskem Dedini ETH Microsoft Vale Boeing BP Subject Lignocellulosic materials Alcohol-chemistry Processes Agricultural practices Computational development Ethanol technologies Aviation Biofuels Processes and sustainability Australia Austria Belgium China Denmark Finland France Germany Guatemala Italy Portugal Spain The Netherlands United Kingdom United States

20 83 ongoing projects NUMBER OF PROJECTS PER DIVISION Biomass Biorefineries Biofuels Technologies Engines Impacts and Sustainability

21 Program FAPESP Areas Agronomy Biophysics Biochemistry Botany Food Science and Technology Ecology Economics Agricultural Engineering Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering Nuclear Engineering Chemical Engineering Sanitary Engineering Physics Genetics Geosciences Interdisciplinary Mathematics Microbiology Chemistry

22 Program Budget Type of grant (scholarships included) R$ BIOEN JP 5,021, BIOEN PITE 5,194, BIOEN Regular 6,282, BIOEN Temático 61,913, TOTAL 78,412, % 7% 8% JP 79% PITE Regular Temático

23 11 Participating Institutions Participating Institutions # Projects UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO 38 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS 13 SECR EST AGRICULTURA PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO DE SÃO PAULO 9 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA JULIO DE MESQUITA FILHO 7 MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO 6 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS 3 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC 2 INST DE ESTUDOS DO COMÉRCIO E NEGOCIAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS 2 SECRETARIA DE DESENV. ECONÔMICO, CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO 1 MINISTÉRIO DA AERONÁUTICA 1 FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS SÃO PAULO 1

24 Research Grants + Scholarships per City Campinas 111 São Paulo 74 São Carlos 56 Piracicaba 40 Lorena 20 Ribeirão Preto 10 Araraquara 9 São José do Rio Preto 7 Sorocaba 6 Botucatu 5 São José dos Campos 4 Santo André 2 Pirassununga 1

25 BIOEN Production Published articles 427 Submitted articles 10 Book chapters 51 Books 3 Thesis 53 Dissertations 109 Presentations in events 348 Media News 28 Awards 3 Patents 17 Softwares 1

26 My Researcher ID BIOEN ResearcherID: H URL: 85% of the articles have been cited

27 My Researcher ID BIOEN

28 BIOEN Site: Mailing List: and

29 BIOEN Site: Mailing List: and available on our website

30

31 Partners

32 FAPESP BIOENERGY PROGRAM BIOEN Program Coordinator Glaucia Mendes Souza Departamento de Bioquímica Instituto de Química Universidade de São Paulo BIOEN Secretariat Mariana P. Massafera - Program Manager Alê V. Machado - Assistant Alexandre Futata - Systems Analyst Committee Marie-Anne Van Sluys Instituto de Biociências Universidade de São Paulo Rubens Maciel Faculdade de Engenharia Química Universidade Estadual de Campinas Heitor Cantarella Instituto Agronômico Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo Andre Nassar Instituto de Estudos do Comércio e Negociações Internacionais